In preparation for season 3 of the Rivals Championship Series, it’s time to revisit where the competitive scene stands leading into the first events this weekend. Before we reminisce on the plays, popoffs, and personalities from last season, let’s get some frequently asked questions and other information about how this list was created out of the way.
Other Articles in the Series
- S2 Top 50: Introduction (you are here)
- S2 Top 50: Honorable Mentions
- S2 Top 50: #50 – 41
- S2 Top 50: #40 – 31
- S2 Top 50: #30 – 21
- S2 Top 50: #20 – 11
- S2 Top 50: #10 – 1
Methodology
There are numerous ways to create a ranking system in any game, and we’ve put much consideration into the options while weighing what fits best for Rivals. This year we’ve elected to use a polling method with player eligibility on the ballot based on RCS standings. Thirty panelists from regions around North America were selected primarily based on their activity, skill, and involvement in the competitive scene. Their ratings and input were aggregated to create the final list.
This method was the favorite to avoid a major point of contention for a scene our size – mainly not having a system in place to “objectively” compare placings in different events against each other. For season 2 events at least, we don’t think weighing or tiering tournaments is wise due to properties like the arbitrary schedule, region availability, and top player attendance with the current size of locals (even though a system like this is likely to be formed during season 3).
Panelists
As mentioned above, 23 panelists were selected primarily based on their activity, skill, and involvement in the competitive scene. Seven additional panelists were selected based on contributions other than skill (while still maintaining some involvement in the competitive scene) for a total panel of 30 members. The panelists are broken down by region here:
Canada:
East Coast:
Central:
West Coast:
Community: (Not region specific. Non-competitive qualifications.)
Player Eligibility
Players were eligible to be on the top 50 ballot if they gathered at least 2 RCS points over the duration of season 2. These circuit points were earned during the season by placing top 32 or higher at RCS events. Players could also be added to the ballot as a write-in by any panelist. Votes on these players were brought forward separately.
Some players had a lot of circuit points in season 2.
Region
Though this list is intended to be for the North American region only, this eligibility system does mean that players from other regions who have traveled and performed well in NA could become qualified. If panelists felt they had enough knowledge to give input, they could rank and vote on them like any other player. Naturally a separate ballot and panelists familiar with each scene are needed for other regions. Separate top player lists for EU and AU will be published following The Top 50.
Inactive Players
Since the competitive season is long and players come and go, panelists were asked to make notes next to any player on the ballot they believed to be inactive. Players with enough flags were removed from the top 50 and certain players were audited additionally to determine activity.
If a player reached a certain threshold of notes indicating that they were highly skilled but inactive, they were moved to an honorable mentions list. Participation is an important part of a growing community!
The Ballot
Taking a page out of the brilliant SSBMRank’s book, we asked our panelists to rate eligible players based on the following question:
Let us know if you have any additional questions in the comments. The S2 Top 50 will be released throughout the week counting down from #50 to #1. We hope you’re looking forward to the reveal!